eVols will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Culture, for and against: Patterns of “Culturespeak” in New Zealand
|Title:||Culture, for and against: Patterns of “Culturespeak” in New Zealand|
show 3 morebiculturalism
|LC Subject Headings:||Ethnology|
|Publisher:||The Polynesian Society|
|Citation:||Goldsmith, Michael. 2003. Culture, for and against: Patterns of “Culturespeak” in New Zealand. Journal of the Polynesian Society 112(3): 280-294.|
|Abstract:||Culture is invoked not only as a means of justifying redress for discrimination or historical injustice, but also as a standard of accountability by which the upholding of rights (or their suppression) can be measured. Rather than assume conceptual coherence regarding the notion of culture that such applications appear to share, it is proposed to analyse them as terms within a broad and open-ended field of "culturespeak," a concept generally ascribed to Ulf Hannerz.|
|Appears in Collections:||Mana'o - Asia-Pacific Region Collection|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in eVols are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.