Show simple item record



Item Description

dc.contributor.author Goldsmith, Michael en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-17T20:43:00Z en_US
dc.date.available 2010-06-17T20:43:00Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2003 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Goldsmith, Michael. 2003. Culture, for and against: Patterns of “Culturespeak” in New Zealand. Journal of the Polynesian Society 112(3): 280-294. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0032-4000 en_US
dc.identifier.other Former Mana'o EPrint ID24 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10524/1533 en_US
dc.description Refereed en_US
dc.description.abstract Culture is invoked not only as a means of justifying redress for discrimination or historical injustice, but also as a standard of accountability by which the upholding of rights (or their suppression) can be measured. Rather than assume conceptual coherence regarding the notion of culture that such applications appear to share, it is proposed to analyse them as terms within a broad and open-ended field of "culturespeak," a concept generally ascribed to Ulf Hannerz. en_US
dc.publisher The Polynesian Society en_US
dc.relation http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/arts_ssci_papers/2/ en_US
dc.subject culturespeak en_US
dc.subject culture en_US
dc.subject language en_US
dc.subject ethnicity en_US
dc.subject multiculturalism en_US
dc.subject biculturalism en_US
dc.subject New Zealand en_US
dc.subject Maori en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Ethnology en_US
dc.subject.lcsh New Zealand en_US
dc.title Culture, for and against: Patterns of “Culturespeak” in New Zealand en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Item File(s)

Files Size Format View
goldsmith_culturespeak.pdf 257.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About