Puna Geothermal Venture's response to the independent technical reports elements I, II, and III (parts I and II)

Item Description

dc.contributor.author	Puna Geothermal Venture	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2012-08-16T19:46:19Z	en_US
dc.date.available	2012-08-16T19:46:19Z	en_US
dc.date.issued	1991-09-05	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Puna Geothermal Venture. 1991. Puna Geothermal Venture's response to the independent technical reports elements I, II, and III (parts I and II). Puna (HI): Puna Geothermal Venture.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10524/23402	en_US
dc.description.abstract	PGV agrees with the conclusion of the Element I Report ("Independent Technical Investigation of the Puna Geothermal Venture Unplanned Steam Release, June 12 and 13, 1991, Puna, Hawaii") that the geothermal resource encountered in the KS-8 well, although quite hot, is manageable through the use of modem well drilling and production technology. Further, PGV generally accepts the recommendations of the Element I Report.	en_US
dc.format.extent	6 pages	en_US
dc.language.iso	en-US	en_US
dc.publisher	Puna Geothermal Venture	en_US
dc.subject	impacts	en_US
dc.subject	PGV	en_US
dc.subject	venting	en_US
dc.subject	Puna	en_US
dc.subject	Hawaii	en_US
dc.title	Puna Geothermal Venture's response to the independent technical reports elements I, II, and III (parts I and II)	en_US
dc.type	Report	en_US
dc.type.dcmi	Text	en_US