Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10524/56878

Selection Process [in Conference on Integrated Online Library Systems Proceedings]

File SizeFormat 
ConfOnlineLibSys.pdf2.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Full Item Record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Ruth Marie-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-02T00:46:28Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-02T00:46:28Z-
dc.date.issued1983-09-
dc.identifier.otherZ699.A1 C578 1983b-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10524/56878-
dc.description.abstractSelection of an integrated Online Library System (lOLS) should begin with an informed, supportive, and enthusiastic administration fully committed to the move from a manual to an automated environment. In early 1982 the UHM Biennium Budget (1983-85) ranked automation as a top priority. Decisions to streamline many processing procedures, freeze the Card Catalog system and implement a Computer Output Microform (COM) Catalog followed shortly thereafter. In response to the growing serious committment to library automation and interest in purchasing a turnkey solution I undertook an "educational" tour of automated libraries and integrated online library system (IOLS ) vendors. It was especially helpful to examine academic library installations to see how they are dealing with situations we will encounter in Hawaii. In January 1983, preparation of the entire library staff for participation in the automation process began.en_US
dc.format.extent10 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen-USen_US
dc.subject.lcshLibraries--United States--Automationen_US
dc.subject.lcshOnline library catalogsen_US
dc.subject.lcshInformation storage and retrieval systemsen_US
dc.titleSelection Process [in Conference on Integrated Online Library Systems Proceedings]en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.dcmiTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Computers, Computing and Information Science



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons