Ethics, standards, and TQM.
Ethics, standards, and TQM.
dc.contributor.author | Botticelli, M G | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-02T15:58:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-02T15:58:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | The most important ethical issue for our profession is the responsibility to assure the care delivered by our colleagues and ourselves meets a self-imposed standard of excellence. There is anecdotal and experimental evidence that we have not fulfilled this obligation. Peer review has proven, for a number of reasons, to be ineffective; however, improvements in the epidemiologic sciences should provide better standards and total quality management (TQM) might prove to be of value in monitoring, comparing and improving the decisions made by physicians. Its promise lies in its emphasis on statistical analysis, its focus on systematic rather than human error, and its use of outcomes as standards. These methods, however, should not diminish our other professional responsibilities: Altruism, peer review, and in Hippocrates' words "to prescribe regimens for the good of our patients-and never do harm to anyone." | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0017-8594 | |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 7601666 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10524/62443 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject.mesh | Ethics, Medical | |
dc.subject.mesh | Hawaii | |
dc.subject.mesh | Peer Review, Health Care | |
dc.subject.mesh | Total Quality Management | |
dc.title | Ethics, standards, and TQM. | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.type.dcmi | Text | |
prism.number | 4 | |
prism.pagerange | 469-71 | |
prism.publicationname | Hawaii medical journal | |
prism.volume | 54 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- 1995-04p469-471.pdf
- Size:
- 383.02 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: