The right to die as an ethical dilemma for new physicians in Hawaii.

dc.contributor.author McDermott, J F Jr
dc.contributor.author Waldron, J A
dc.contributor.author Ponce, D E
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-02T16:15:08Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-02T16:15:08Z
dc.date.issued 1992-02
dc.description.abstract In the Cruzan case, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged the patient's right to refuse treatment but limited the decision-making involvement of the family when the patient's wishes are unknown. A study of 118 graduating physicians at the John A. Burns School of Medicine revealed their most significant clinical experience involving an ethical dilemma during their 3rd and 4th years was their involvement with families in the decision to discontinue treatment for terminal patients. These findings underscore the need for a focus on this issue in the curriculum.
dc.identifier.issn 0017-8594
dc.identifier.pubmed 1582831
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10524/62623
dc.language.iso eng
dc.subject.mesh Attitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject.mesh Education, Medical
dc.subject.mesh Ethics, Medical
dc.subject.mesh Hawaii
dc.subject.mesh Humans
dc.subject.mesh Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence
dc.subject.mesh Right to Die/legislation & jurisprudence
dc.title The right to die as an ethical dilemma for new physicians in Hawaii.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.type.dcmi Text
prism.number 2
prism.pagerange 44-5
prism.publicationname Hawaii medical journal
prism.volume 51
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1992-02p44-45.pdf
Size:
185.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: